After meeting and listening to many Brewers this year, it became obvious, the importance of hop aroma quality has never been greater than it is today. Aroma quality evaluation has been classically considered the hand-rub analysis. Each year Brewers gather to evaluate the annual harvest using this technique.
Where we are today....
Laboratory analysis can accurately determine the total hop oil content by steam distillation, a portion of the oil can be analyzed by Gas Chromatography (GC). This GC data provides a break-down of the 5-7 most common compounds found in hop oil. Additional techniques such as: GCMS, headspace, SPME, SBSE, and more, are used to further define hop aroma. Yet, with all of our technology, nothing seems to effectively grasp the evaluation of aroma quality. Furthermore, there are currently no techniques that allow a Brewer to accurately calculate hop oil additions or substitutions.
What is the problem.....?
At AAR, we propose a shift in the focus of laboratory aroma evaluation. The classic data used to describe hop aroma found in varietal catalogs, product labels, and so on, is not only confusing, but flawed. This classic approach uses the GC results in terms of the "% area" of a "peak" to determine the content of various hop oil components. One major difficulty with % area revolves around the fact that when one component disappears or is absent, the others appear to increase or be in greater than expected concentrations. When comparing this type of data to the "typical" ranges for a variety it becomes difficult to interpret. See Figure 1.
Figure 1. Comparing the % results of these two Cascade pellet samples, one can see where the loss or absence of myrcene in Sample B results in higher than expected results for the other components. Why? The total of this data needs to add up to 100%, remove some of one component, all others now make up a slightly larger proportional slice of the pie.
We Have a Solution......!
ASBC Hops - 17 outlines an alternative technique to the "% area" approach and work at AAR Lab has begun to evaluate as many varieties as possible. This technique is much more quantitative, and also provides data that just makes more sense. We propose adding the units of (mg/100g) of hops in addition to % area to all of our Aroma Quality data. See Table 1. below for the new data format used in evaluating Aroma Quality.
Table 1. The addition of the (mg/100grams) data clearly illustrates the improvement made in the interpretation of the Cascade Pellet data. Some very interesting results have been discovered studying single hop varieties grown in different regions.
Where does this go from here...?
At AAR we are expanding our aromatic profiles to include many more compounds. In addition, we will be providing more comprehensive Aroma Quality (AQ) certificates of analysis (C of A's) in 2019.
By providing this new perspective on Aroma Quality we are hopeful that we can contribute to a greater understanding of hops including: proper drying & preservation techniques, a tool for Brewers to find and replicate recipes, new and more accurate varietal specification ranges, and the identification of regional and seasonal differences in aromatic qualities.
Update 6/2019 - We have two Aroma Quaility Packages Available for 2019!!!
How do I know when my hops are ready to harvest?
Determining the timing of harvest is difficult, many different techniques are used including lupulin gland color, smell, cone size, and moisture. Yet, none of these techniques are completely fool-proof. Harvest too early and your crop may not meet the quality standards for either oil or alpha content for the particular variety. Having good analytical data is a definitive indicator of the “ripeness” of the hop cone. Growing location, weather, soil, and a variety of other factors can affect the harvest timing. In addition, each variety will mature at different times, often referred to as early, mid, or late season varieties. The general relationship to alpha content, total oil, dry matter and quality of hops over time is demonstrated in figure 1. This relationship will be slightly different for each variety and each growing location.
There are three main pre-harvest testing techniques that are most often used. First, hops used for bittering are tested for “alpha & beta acid content” when they are suspected of being ripe. You can then refer these values to the standards of A/B content for your particular variety. Secondly, crops that will be sold for aroma qualities, “total oil content” is tested to evaluate the content versus the variety standard. Lastly, “moisture/dry matter” can be used as the sole indicator of harvest timing. By using these pre-harvest testing techniques, you can be sure that harvest occurs at the peak of quality. In addition, for growers with many different varieties, it allows you to prioritize and schedule your harvest.
At AAR we include free moisture/dry matter results with all pre-harvest acid or oil tests. This just makes sense, the moisture content is critical to the correct calculation of your results, so why not make this process consistent and as accurate as possible.
Alpha & Beta Acids – Role in Brewing
Alpha acids are responsible for the bittering of beer. While boiling the wort, hops are added, heat results in a conversion (or isomerization) of the alpha acids into the more water soluble iso-alpha acid form, which in turn, allows them to be more readily dissolved into the wort. Typically, the longer the hops are boiled, more alpha acids are transformed and ultimately, the more bitter the beer. As a side note, hops with low cohumulone content are reported to yield brews with a “smoother” bitterness profile. In addition, you have probably seen IBU’s or (International Bitterness Units) on a chalkboard at your local pub. At AAR, we perform the ASBC method Beer-23, which is the basis for these values. Another very important role of alpha acids is their antiseptic quality. By adding hops, beer is preserved and remains fresh. Although, care must be taken to prevent iso-alpha acids from reacting with light which can cause a skunky smell. This is why most beer bottles are brown or green.
Beta Acids also play a role in brewing, adding some bitterness and having beneficial antiseptic qualities. It is important to note they do not isomerize, but rather oxidize during the boil. Although not fully understood, they may also play a major role in aged or dry-hopped beers. When reviewing your results, the beta acid content and the ratio of the alpha/beta content can also be good indicators of variety or cone maturation.
Alpha Acids Testing
There are two standard ASBC (Association of Brewing Chemists) methods of analysis that are currently offered, Hops-6A Alpha & Beta Acids in Hops by Spectrophotometry, and Hops-14 Alpha & Beta Acids in Hops by HPLC (International Method). I will refer to these by either SPEC or HPLC for the remainder of this article. When conducting either of these tests there are three main alpha acid compounds that are analyzed: cohumulone, humulone and adhumulone, and three main beta acid compounds: colupulone, lupulone and adlupulone.
The SPEC test uses a spectrophotometer, these instruments have been around since the 1940’s and subject a sample of the hop extract to specific wavelengths of light. The amount of light that is “absorbed” when passing though the sample has a fixed relationship with the amount of alpha or beta acids. This test is not able to distinguish or quantify the individual acids.
HPLC or High-Performance Liquid Chromatography hit its stride in the 1970’s and is now the workhorse of the modern analytical lab. HPLC first “injects” a portion of the sample into a liquid stream which pumps the sample through a steel column or tube filled with sand-like particles. Under high pressure, and the interaction of the sample with these particles, the alpha and beta acids are separated. They continue to flow through a “cell” where a special spectrophotometer is used to detect the compounds. This technique has many advantages by avoiding interferences and quantifying individual acids through this “separation” process.
HPLC vs SPEC
Typically, a pre-harvest alpha acid lab “SPEC” or spectroscopy test run by ASBC method HOPS-6A will include a total alpha/beta single value, not corrected for moisture. The SPEC method is designed for testing dried or pelletized samples, and it struggles to effectively extract fresh samples due to their high moisture content. High moisture content also causes an unstable reading of the sample and often requires duplicate analyses averaged to ensure the results are close. The SPEC test uses no standard reference material; results are solely based on the accuracy of the instrument being used. The optics and light sources of these instruments deteriorate over time, and unless it’s properly qualified and maintained, can yield results with significant error. The ASBC round robin testing does not provide help in evaluating the accuracy of fresh wet hops analyzed by SPEC. Based on these factors, the SPEC test is really only suited for post-harvest analysis of dried hops or pellets, where it still has many disadvantages when compared to HPLC.
At AAR, for pre- & post-harvest, we recommend the HPLC alpha & beta acids test, which now includes values for HSI (Hop Storage Index), % alpha acids, % beta acids, % cohumulone, % colupulone, dry matter and moisture. This internationally accepted test has many advantages over the SPEC test including; use of an external qualified standard reference material, a “phase” extraction with an aqueous/solvent system much better at dealing with “wet” samples, greater precision & accuracy, and cohumulone/colupulone content helps identify variety specific characteristics. In addition, we report the values at 10% moisture and provide the acceptable alpha/beta ranges for your sample. Some individuals also use HSI, dry matter, A/B ratios in combination with the % alpha to predict harvest timing. Obtaining this information for your varieties year after year can help create a much better understanding and provide a valuable record to be referenced moving forward.
Dry Matter/Moisture Testing
Dry matter is basically the (Total Weight - Moisture) of a hop cone sample. As the hop cones mature dry matter increases and conversely the moisture content decreases. Dry matter is a good technique that can be done to monitor the maturation of your crop. Depending on the growing region and variety the target dry matter ranges from 21-28% or a moisture content of 79 – 72%. Dry matter typically increases 1-2 % per week during the harvest season.
Typical lab tests will require you to pay more for a moisture test or determine the moisture yourself. Moisture testing is a time consuming process and food dehydrators are not capable of fully drying samples. This can add significant error to your results, and just simply compounds the confusion when trying to calculate your results at 10% moisture. Consistency in the moisture analysis technique here is key. Try our Hop Calculator and you will see how small changes in the moisture and alpha values have a large effect on the values at 10% moisture. These 10% results are critical, as they are the values you will compare to varietal standards when verifying your crop quality and ripeness.
At AAR, we provide a free dry matter/moisture analysis with any Acid/Oil test. We want to provide you with the most consistent and accurate data. The harvest timing is critical to the quality of your crop, why sacrifice the quality of the testing technique? Again, try the hop calculators; small errors in moisture, alpha, or oil content here are magnified when calculating the values at 10% moisture.
Post-processed moisture content of pelletized or whole cone hops is another important aspect to consider. A target range of 8 - 12% (sometimes higher for whole cone) is the general consensus. Dried too much the hops will crumble, leave too wet and they are subject to mold. Check out our hop calculators for tools to aid you in accurate tuning of your oast.
Essential Oil – Role in Brewing
The essential oil within hops is where all the great aroma and flavor comes from. The role of aroma in brewing has increased significantly due to dry-hopping, the term used to describe any hop additions to wort after cooling, or beer during/after fermentation. All sorts of devices and techniques are being developed to impart aroma into beer. Brewers adjust recipes in regards to the amount of oil in hops. In addition,the aromatic profiles of hop varieties are very important when trying to consistently impart these flavors in beer. Providing the total oil content, as well as the GC (Gas Chromatography) profile of your hops allows brewers to verify the aroma quality. In addition, much importance has been placed on the regional differences in hop aroma, borrowing from the French term terroir - in reference to grapes. At AAR, we are developing advanced techniques to evaluate terroir and learning how to utilize these techniques for marketing and quality purposes.
Essential Oil Testing
At AAR we analyze pre- or post-harvest samples by the industry standard ASBC Hops-13, Total Essential Oils in Hops by Steam Distillation. This test specifies the use of a rather complicated apparatus, in which we have carefully tuned and refined our technique. Through our study of this process we have ensured that elimination of losses due to heat degradation and the proper collection of the fragile hop oil volatiles has been achieved.
As a hop plant matures, the alpha acid content levels off, yet oil content continues to rise. This is why many growers have a tendency to harvest too early before oil content has reached the desirable levels. At AAR our pre-harvest oil test includes results for total oil content mL/100g, moisture, dry matter, oil content values at 10% moisture, and acceptable ranges for the variety being tested. Pre-harvest oil testing is recommended when your customers are purchasing hops for their aromatic qualities.
The specific aroma profile of your pre- or post- harvest sample can also be evaluated by analyzing a portion of the oil by GC (Gas Chromatography). At AAR our GC method is based on ASBC Hops-17, which is the industry standard when it comes to evaluating quality. The GC aroma profile also reveals the variety specific “finger print” of your hops. This is another layer of quality by ensuring your customer that they are receiving the correct variety. Our results match well against many published varietal specifications (as the same technique was used to obtain their data). GC aroma testing includes the Total Oil mL/100g, and the % of beta-pinene, myrcene, linalool, caryophyllene, farnesene, humulene, and geraniol.
HSI – Hop Storage Index
Hop storage index was developed in the 1970’s to yield information on the quality and storage potential of a particular variety. When hops react with oxygen, a degradation or oxidation of the hops occurs. To monitor this process, hops are ground and extracted with a solvent. A portion of the solvent is treated and measured at two different light wavelengths. As the oxidation progresses the adsorption of light at 325nm decreases and increases at 275nm. So, when looking at the ratio of the two values A275/A325, some general indicators of quality can be inferred.
<0.25 - Very Fresh
<0.31 - Freshly picked
0.31 – 0.40 - Normal range for processed or stored hops
0.40 – 0.50 - Aged hops
0.50 – 0.60 - Old Hops
At AAR, we include the HSI result with either the HPLC or SPEC assay. The HSI can also be used to predict loss of alpha acids, various approaches are used but due to the significant amount of variables, it is not without significant error. To adjust utilization rates or observe losses directly under your storage conditions, a HPLC test can be run to obtain the exact values. Oxygen, heat, and light are the hops enemy, so keep this in mind when storing your crop.
I have my crop harvested, dried to the target moisture, how can I let customers know I have a quality product?
While pre-harvest testing has helped you target the harvest timing, test results can also aid in establishing a baseline of your crop before any processing or drying has occurred. In addition, this data can be used for marketing the sale of your wet fresh hops.
Pelletizing and drying can cause significant losses of both oil and acids. By looking at the A/B or oil content, pre- vs. post- one can adjust temperatures, timing and parameters to optimize their hop processing. Alternatively, one can simply rely on the post-processing evaluation of the crop, figure 2.
Whether dried whole cone or pellets, the certification of your crop is essential in achieving successful sales. Providing your customers with a comprehensive certificate of analysis (C of A) containing the alpha/beta, HSI, total oil, & GC aroma profile has many advantages over your competition. Brewers can adjust their recipes to accommodate seasonal variability, identify the variety’s aromatic fingerprint, and trust that the product has been evaluated correctly for quality.
There are many methods used for the determination of ABV (Alcohol by Volume), which one suits your needs? Are you starting a quality program? Not happy with your current laboratory? Wanting to achieve accuracy and precision with your label claim or nutritional facts panel vs ongoing production?
"Why not align your quality program with the testing methods used by regulatory agencies?"
Makes sense right? The TTB (Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trad Bureau) has set out to explain their testing protocol to verify label claims in their 2004-1 ruling. Within the ruling they define what procedures will be used to verify calories, alcohol, carbohydrates, and protein. These are mostly AOAC and several in-haus TTB procedures. For ABV verification of Standard Malt Beverages, Flavored Malt Beverages, Standard Wines, Ciders, and Sake, and Flavored Wines they utilize the AOAC technique of Gas Chromatography-Flame Ionization Detection or (GC-FID).
At AAR we have chosen to align our testing protocols with those of the 2004-1 ruling including the GC-FID procedure for ABV testing. These procedures are also aligned with FDA Menu testing for nutritional facts, an added bonus. In an ever evolving market of products containing non-traditional ingredients and utilizing new brewing techniques, we feel this gives everyone involved the best chance for success.
There are many advantages to the GC-FID technique, many of them revolve around the disadvantages of others. Let's look at chromatography or (separation) versus spectroscopy. The most widely used technique of spectroscopy (NIR or RI) takes a look at the absorbance spectrum of the entire sample (ethanol + matrix). Matrix for our purposes here is everything else in the sample that's not ethanol. So, in spectroscopy, a one point standard of water/ethanol is used to calibrate the absorbance of the instrument. How does it account for the matrix effects, or separate them, or eliminate their impact on the results?
In chromatography, we can use a multi-dimensional approach to eliminating interferences. Meaning we are are looking at "apples to apples." The sample is introduced into the "inlet" where our first dimension goes to work. The temperature is selective to the boiling point of ethanol, so we can already
leave behind many compounds that are not volatile, or have higher boiling points, such as, carbohydrates, sugars, organic acids, etc. even before they enter our second dimension of separation the "column." The compounds are further separated based on their chemical qualities and interaction with the stationary phase (column) and pushed through to the detector by the mobile phase (gas).
In addition, the use of external standards for every run is key for keeping all samples/standards on a level playing field, thus allowing many other analytical issues to fall away. The result of all this is we get to look directly at the ethanol "peak" in a standard versus an ethanol "peak" in the sample. Apples to apples...
In the case of sample vs standard, an internal standard is also used to further level the playing field, with 5 standard concentrations used, you know that the sample is bracketed, linearity is evaluated and all samples are run in duplicate. Any poor duplications (>5% diff) are re-tested. On a 4.2% ABV labeled product, our analysis resulted in a %RSD of 1.52 (N=16). Therefore our analysis produced values from 4.14% to 4.26% ABV, all well within the 0.3% acceptance range by TTB. Even more importantly, using the same method as regulatory agencies to evaluate your product gives a greater chance of success.
AAR has been using this technique and we have great success on a wide variety of matrices, non-alcoholic, low-alcohol, wine, ciders, and more. Through separation we can achieve precision and accuracy, eliminating the matrix effects found using other techniques.
There is a ton of information out there about alpha and beta acids with the current craft IPA boom. Plant suppliers, producers and brewers need to characterize their products to brew great beer and achieve effective marketing. I see many references to % cohumulone and % colupulone, and hope to clearly and concisely define what these numbers refer to, and where they come from.
The % cohumulone (an alpha acid) and % colupulone (a beta acid) numbers can only be obtained but analyzing hops by HPLC (High Performance Liquid Chromatography). The figure above is the output from the ASBC International Method, we see cohumulone (an alpha acid) and colupulone (a beta acid) identified. When someone indicates they have 4% Alpha Acids (with 25% cohumulone), they are referring to the numbers obtained from this method. Let's break it down.....
So on a weight basis, (% or g/100g(same thing)) the hops has a total of 4% or 4grams per 100g of hops. This value is all the alpha acids added together.
Cohumulone is analyzed and we find the hops contains 1% cohumulone. So, we describe the amount of cohumulone to be 25% relative to the total. 1/4=.25 x100 = 25%
These values should be more clearly defined as (cohumulone - 25% of the Total Alpha Acids)
Same exact process for the calculation of colupulone as it relates to the total amount of beta acids.
Who cares? and Why? Well, there are many advantages to characterizing your products or ingredients in this way. First, the realtive amounts of colupulone and cohumulone can be a strong indicator of what variety being analyzed, grown, or used in brew, just by simply comparing the results to variety catalogs. In addition, dry hopping and the aroma associated has put a keen focus on the role of beta acids in the brewing process (which until recently, has been diminished). So, more details here about the hops helps in fine tuning.
Also, this information can better define the total amounts to be added based on seasonal variability. Lastly, I have found this method procedure is more rugged and accurate than the more widely used spectrophotometric assay (we do this too).
So, get more bang for your buck, know your product, sell more of it, and brew a better beer. Thanks, ZL